tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-789886813706673673.post7748863134610328404..comments2024-03-27T13:25:59.811+00:00Comments on Upper Thames Moths: Cochylis sp.Peter Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10828069795222628270noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-789886813706673673.post-11634762624387574862017-08-07T11:27:04.073+01:002017-08-07T11:27:04.073+01:00Thanks Dave and Adam.
NigelThanks Dave and Adam.<br /><br />NigelNigelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00643061027555120933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-789886813706673673.post-32812443217935167782017-08-05T16:06:54.431+01:002017-08-05T16:06:54.431+01:00I think that is a good call Dave. There is an imag...I think that is a good call Dave. There is an image on the Hants moth website that looks a very good fit to this moth Nigel (second image of three)Adam Bassetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17490120978686132205noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-789886813706673673.post-19298292162230343742017-08-05T01:12:27.182+01:002017-08-05T01:12:27.182+01:00I think this is one that needs the attentions of P...I think this is one that needs the attentions of Peter's microscope to be absolutely sure but I'm tempted towards a rather well-marked Falseuncaria ruficiliana. I don't think the image in Sterling & Parsons is a particularly good likeness for that species. Dave Wiltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12533795070964851106noreply@blogger.com