tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-789886813706673673.post8212543411460214885..comments2024-03-27T13:25:59.811+00:00Comments on Upper Thames Moths: More microsPeter Hallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10828069795222628270noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-789886813706673673.post-54210151797597412442017-07-17T08:11:37.866+01:002017-07-17T08:11:37.866+01:00Thank you for your comments. Although I'm gett...Thank you for your comments. Although I'm getting reasonable catches I am not getting many new macros for the garden so it's good to get these micros to add interest.Andy Newboldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11423367322188911753noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-789886813706673673.post-24762173817013387092017-07-16T21:27:05.521+01:002017-07-16T21:27:05.521+01:00I think Roeslerstammia erxlebella is reasonably co...I think Roeslerstammia erxlebella is reasonably common locally wherever there's lime. I agree with Adam that the second is Cydia fagiglandana (a beech feeder), and the next is Phycita roborella with those thickened bases to the antennae. The last one is a Gypsonoma but might be a candidate for sociana as it doesn't seem to have much brown in the colouring, just black and white.Dave Wiltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12533795070964851106noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-789886813706673673.post-40183545837843122822017-07-16T20:45:13.066+01:002017-07-16T20:45:13.066+01:00Phycita roborella for the third.Phycita roborella for the third.Nigelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00643061027555120933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-789886813706673673.post-46485300108197797162017-07-16T19:14:34.680+01:002017-07-16T19:14:34.680+01:00Hi Andy, yes to R. erxlebella, though I don't ...Hi Andy, yes to R. erxlebella, though I don't know how unusual it is in your area. The second looks like Cydia fagiglandana. I'll leave the third and the last is G. dealbeana as you say.Adam Bassetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17490120978686132205noreply@blogger.com