And finally, with apologies (but this should enable us to get up to date), a clutch of macros which either we're not sure on, or, in one case, which we need confirmation on: one of a couple of what I think are Smoky Wainscots from 20th; a presumed, though rather worn, Light Arches from last night; and a complete mystery - also rather worn - from 16th. Hopefully shouldn't be too controversial - many thanks for any help.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/817cc/817cc1844f554062a0f2d2544d501b0436cdf4b3" alt="" |
Possible Smoky Wainscot, 20/6/14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/088a4/088a40d010c74f902a8ab79fa048dd77509e5415" alt="" |
Possible Smoky Wainscot, 20/6/14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9abf/c9abffa95da8544481181726e32adabe26396972" alt="" |
Presumed Light Arches, 21/6/14 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fe9d/6fe9dfdea6c66934842d12ac0e4425ca1a70e5c3" alt="" |
Worn unknown, 16/6/14 |
It turns out I was underestimating how many moths we were getting: on the 13th, I've worked out, we had 207 individuals of 55 species, which compares pretty well with the best we had last summer - we should break 300 individuals at some point, I suspect, but 200+ is not bad for mid-June. Steve and Xander Goddard.
Yes to Smoky, yes to Light Arches and yes to a worn unknown (maybe a Bright-line Brown-eye)
ReplyDeleteAgree with BLBE :)
ReplyDelete