Being unseasonably cold last night (but not, at least, too windy) meant that overall numbers were down, although I did manage to catch 49 species (35 macro & 14 micro) in the garden. Magpie and Clay Triple-lines were the only NFY macro-moths, although Purple Bar and Pale Prominent appeared again. Some new micro-species would be useful to get confirmation on:
I think you're right, Olly, but the rufescens looks a bit pale (but it is probably just worn) and the iridescent Coleophora should be dissected, I think. There are 3 species it could be, but it's not mayrella. The cana I wouldn't be sure about, but somebody else may be. Andy.
Thanks Andrew. There were 4 H. rufescens in the trap this morning and they were all quite worn however the photograph makes it look a bit paler. I agree the Coleophora should be dissected to be sure, although I should have added that the forewing length was 8 mm which might indicate C. trifolii over the smaller relatives.
I think you're right, Olly, but the rufescens looks a bit pale (but it is probably just worn) and the iridescent Coleophora should be dissected, I think. There are 3 species it could be, but it's not mayrella. The cana I wouldn't be sure about, but somebody else may be.
ReplyDeleteAndy.
Thanks Andrew. There were 4 H. rufescens in the trap this morning and they were all quite worn however the photograph makes it look a bit paler. I agree the Coleophora should be dissected to be sure, although I should have added that the forewing length was 8 mm which might indicate C. trifolii over the smaller relatives.
DeleteApart from the Coleophorid already mentioned, I agree with all of those IDs.
DeleteThanks Dave. I'll leave it as Colephorid sp. as they obviously require dissection to determine definitively.
DeleteA clear image of the antennae would help a lot.
ReplyDelete